When Phil Housley took to the podium for his inaugural press conference, he promised a fast-paced, high octane offensive approach, the likes of which the fans in Buffalo hadn’t seen in over a decade. Fresh off of a deep playoff run with the Nashville Predators, he was the odds-on favorite to return to coach the team that drafted him in 1982. As an assistant in Nashville, Housley helped coordinate an offensive attack centered around puck-moving defensemen – a style he intended to bring with him to Western New York.

Gone were the days of watching Sabres defenders hopelessly attempt to thread 100-foot passes through the neutral zone. No longer would their young roster flounder in obscurity, shackled by the incessantly dull strategies set forth by Dan Bylsma. Fans rejoiced with a newfound confidence that their team would finally enter the playoff conversation.

Buffalo Sabres head coach Phil Housley (Danny Wild-USA TODAY Sports)

Seven months later, supporters of the blue and gold couldn’t be more disappointed. With 11 wins in their first 44 games, the Sabres are on pace to finish the season with 57 points. In a year where Buffalo was supposed to emerge from the league basement, they find themselves trapped deeper than ever.

Though a step backward was always a possibility, especially when implementing a completely revamped style of attack, nobody expected another last-place finish. With a roster that is, on paper, significantly improved from last season, some fans have started to question Housley’s effectiveness behind the bench, begging the question – how much time will the Sabres give him to right the ship?

A Toxic Locker Room

Discord within the Sabres dressing room began well before Housley arrived on the scene. After two frustrating, uninspired seasons under Bylsma, reports of complacency and poor communication began to emerge.

A frustrated Jack Eichel seethed during his locker room clean out interview at the end of last season.

“I’m here to win. I think guys want to win,” said Eichel. “There’s a difference between saying you want to win and actually wanting to win and putting the work in and dedicating your life to it.”

Soon after, rumors of a rift between Eichel and Bylsma began to surface. Tim Murray added fuel to the fire during his end-of-the-year press conference, stating that the coaches should “put a coffee in their hand once in a while and do two hours of video instead of three and get out and get to know our players and talk to our players.”

Nobody will fault a coach for being detail-oriented, but Bylsma’s downfall stemmed from a lack of time spent communicating with players and a failure to maintain control of his roster.

Former head coach, Dan Bylsma lost control of the Sabres locker room. (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

Mid-way through his first season with the Sabres, Housley has run into the same issues. A deep-rooted losing culture began to fester long before his arrival in Western New York, and his hands-off approach to managing his team hasn’t helped matters.

Right off the bat, it became abundantly clear that a lack of consistent in-game effort remained an ongoing problem. While players like Ryan O’Reilly lamented poor execution during postgame interviews, Housley remained sanguine to a fault, focusing on the few things his team did well, versus the myriad of inadequacies evident to even the most casual spectator.

As the losses have piled up, his upbeat demeanor has shifted, expressing disappointment in his team’s inability to execute his gameplans. This critical approach has been long overdue. On a squad without a defined captain, the onus is on the coaches to provide leadership and guidance, especially when the core of the roster features several young players who have yet to experience sustained success at the NHL level.

Housley is lauded as an expert tactician, however, it is yet to be seen whether or not he can inspire a culture shift in Buffalo.

Related: Sabres Culture of Losing Persists

Lack of Depth on the Sabres Roster

In his first offseason as general manager, Jason Botterill went to work overhauling the Sabres depth, particularly on defense. With the addition of players like Victor Antipin, Nathan Beaulieu and Marco Scandella, the blue line appeared much more formidable entering the 2017-18 season. Not only were these acquisitions low-risk, high-reward investments, but they perfectly reflected Housley’s puck-carrying defensive prototype.

Buffalo Sabres defenseman, Marco Scandella (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

Early on, injuries on the back end began to pile up, forcing certain players into roles that required heavier workloads. As the team has regained its health, Antipin and Beaulieu have failed to maintain their places on the roster, often being scratched in favor of more conservative, veteran players who do not fit the Housley mold.

Underachievers left over from the last regime have also struggled to grasp the new-look strategy, causing uncertainty as to whether the problem lies with the players or the coaching staff.

At the end of last season, a vast majority of the blame fell on Bylsma’s shoulders. With players like Sam Reinhart, Ryan O’Reilly and Kyle Okposo on the roster, fans felt that that poor coaching was the biggest reason that the Sabres missed the playoffs for the seventh straight season. That tune has changed, though, as the same cast of characters have performed equally poorly under a brand new staff.

Rome wasn’t built in a day, and nobody will fault Botterill for not purging the entire roster in just one offseason. On the same token, Housley cannot bear the blame for failing to maximize production from a core of players that have become content with the complacent atmosphere left behind by the last regime.

Talent Influx on the Horizon

Last week, fans got a taste of things to come as they watched Linus Ullmark and Brendan Guhle get their first opportunity with the big club this season.